A design-based research study of a kinesthetic intelligence- and adversity quotient-based curriculum for student-athletes’ dual careers

Eko Mulyadi; Ishafit Ishafit; Hendro Widodo

doi:10.32698/03842

A design-based research study of a kinesthetic intelligence- and adversity quotient-based curriculum for student-athletes’ dual careers

Eko Mulyadi⁽¹⁾, Ishafit Ishafit⁽²⁾, Hendro Widodo⁽³⁾,
(1) Universitas Ahmad Dahlan, Yogyakarta

Indonesia
(2) Universitas Ahmad Dahlan, Yogyakarta

Indonesia
(3) Universitas Ahmad Dahlan, Yogyakarta

Indonesia

Corresponding Author

DOI : https://doi.org/10.32698/03842

Full Text:

Language : en

Abstract

Special Sports Classes (SSC) at the high school level face challenges in balancing academic and athletic achievement due to the dual demands placed on student-athletes. This study aims to examine curriculum implementation, kinesthetic intelligence development, and Adversity Quotient (AQ) coaching to propose an integrated curriculum model. A qualitative multisite case study was conducted at SMAN 1 Sewon, MAN 2 Yogyakarta, and SMAS Muhammadiyah 7 Yogyakarta. Participants were selected purposively based on their involvement in SSC implementation, including school principals or program coordinators, teachers, sports coaches, and student-athletes. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews, observations, and document analysis and were analyzed thematically through coding, categorization, and cross-site comparison to identify patterns and contextual differences. The findings reveal an 8.19-point gap in academic scores between SSC and regular students, alongside the absence of a dedicated SSC curriculum. Kinesthetic intelligence development remains predominantly practice-oriented, while AQ coaching emerges informally through spiritual traditions and competitive pressures. Based on these findings, this study proposes a conceptual model of the Kinesthetic–Adversity Quotient (KK-AQ) curriculum, grounded in embodied cognition and the CO2RE framework. The proposed model suggests the potential to integrate academic learning, kinesthetic development, and adversity resilience within a coherent curriculum. This study contributes a conceptual foundation for curriculum development aimed at supporting student-athletes in pursuing athletic excellence while strengthening their academic resilience.

Keywords

Special sports classes, Integrated curriculum, Kinesthetic intelligence, Adversity quotient, Embodied cognition

References

Aquilina, D., & Henry, I. (2020). Elite athletes and university education in Europe: A review of policy and practice. International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics, 12(1), 25–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/19406941003634024

Bailey, R. (2006). Physical education and sport in schools: A review of benefits and outcomes. Journal of School Health, 76(8), 397–401. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1746-1561.2006.00132.x

Bassey, U., & Chinonso Ochor, D. (2024). Effects of sport participation on the lifestyle of secondary school adolescents in Uyo Metropolis. American Journal of Physical Education and Health Science, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.54536/ajpehs.v2i2.3644

Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and Education. Macmillan.

Faella, P., Digennaro, S., & Iannaccone, A. (2025). Educational practices in motion: A scoping review of embodied learning approaches in school. Frontiers in Education, 10, 1568744. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1568744

Fraser-Thomas, J., Côté, J., & Deakin, J. (2008). Understanding dropout and prolonged engagement in adolescent competitive sport. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 9(5), 645–662. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2007.08.003

Freire, P. (1993). Pedagogy of the Oppressed (Revised). Continuum.

Gardner, H. (2011). Frames of Mind: The Theory of Multiple Intelligences. Basic Books.

Guidotti, F., Cortis, C., & Capranica, L. (2022). Dual career of student-athletes: A systematic review. European Journal of Sport Science, 22(4), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2024.1507859

Hamalik, O. (2017). Dasar-dasar pengembangan kurikulum (Cetakan ke-7). PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Jiang, X., Guo, J., & Chen, Z. (2024). Exploring an athletic talent development environment in China: A case study of a sport-friendly high school. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 74, 102696. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2024.102696

Kementerian Pemuda dan Olahraga Republik Indonesia. (2024). Peraturan Menteri Pemuda dan Olahraga Republik Indonesia Nomor 11 Tahun 2024 tentang Sentra Pembinaan Olahraga Prestasi di Daerah.

Kim, M. S., & Cruz, A. B. (2016). A comparative study on sport-specialized schools in South Korea. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 36(2), 315–328.

Lewis, A. J., & Miel, A. (1981). Curriculum Planning for Better Teaching and Learning (4th ed.). Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

Lewy, A. (1977). Handbook of Curriculum Evaluation. Unesco.

Mulyadi, E., Ishafit, I., Widodo, H., & Montaño, E. C. N. (2025). Balancing excellence: Character development and academic support in special sports classes. Journal of Professional Teacher Education, 3(2), 85–93. https://doi.org/10.12928/jprotect.v3i2.2135

Pemerintah Daerah Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta. (2024). Peraturan Daerah Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta Nomor 5 Tahun 2024 tentang Penyelenggaraan Keolahragaan.

Pratt, D. (1980). Curriculum Design and Development. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Inc.

Republik Indonesia. (2003). Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 20 Tahun 2003 tentang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional.

Retnaningsih, R. (2023). Evaluation of the implementation of the sports special talent class programme at high school. Al-Ishlah: Jurnal Pendidikan, 15(3). https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v15i4.2989

Santoso, N. (2020). Evaluasi program kelas khusus olahraga tingkat Sekolah Menengah Atas di Kabupaten Kulonprogo Yogyakarta. Majalah Ilmiah Olahraga (MAJORA), 26(1), 8–19. https://doi.org/10.21831/majora.v26i1.30512

Saryono. (2021). Evaluasi implementasi Kelas Khusus Olahraga. Jurnal Pendidikan Jasmani Indonesia, 17(2), 120–134. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpji.v17i2.44391

Simon, M., Marttinen, R., & Phillips, S. (2021). Marginalized girls’ gendered experiences within a constructivist afterschool program (REACH). Sport, Education and Society, 26(6), 579–591. https://doi.org/10.1080/13573322.2020.1764926

Stoltz, P. (2005). Adversity Quotient: Turning Obstacles into Opportunities. Wiley.

Sukmadinata, N. S. (2022). Pengembangan kurikulum: Teori dan praktik (Cetakan ke-23). PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Taba, H. (1962). Curriculum Development: Theory and Practice. Harcourt, Brace & World.

Thompson, F., & others. (2022). The Impacts of Sports Schools on Holistic Athlete Development: A systematic review. Sports Medicine.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Harvard University Press.

Yin, P., Bin Abdullah, M. F., & Hassan, M. F. B. H. (2024). The key factors of talent development environment for campus football athletes in China. Cogent Social Sciences, 10(1), 2431590. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2024.2431590

Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (Sixth edition). SAGE.